Europe Is Fed Up and Wants Its Own AI | WIRED
Skip to main content
Menu
WIRED
SECURITY
POLITICS
THE BIG STORY
BUSINESS
SCIENCE
CULTURE
REVIEWS
Menu
WIRED
Account
Account
Newsletters
Security
Politics
The Big Story
Business
Science
Culture
ReviewsChevron
MoreExpand
The Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED Consulting
Newsletters
Podcasts
Video
Livestreams
Merch
Search
Search
Steven Levy
BusinessJun 26, 2026 11:00 AMEurope Is Fed Up and Wants Its Own AI
It's a stretch to think that the continent can build a top-tier model, but it has an advantage: Donald Trump.
Emmanuel Macron, president of France, discussed AI's risks at the G7 Summit.Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Getty Images
Comment
Loader
Save Story
Save this story
Comment
Loader
Save Story
Save this story
Earlier this month I attended Vivatech, a huge tech conference in Paris. One fear dominated the discussions: the prospect of ending up stuck using American AI, trained on American values. While the US and China are locked in an AI arms race, France and Germany, which consider their engineering talent second to none, feel boxed out. Not only are they demanding to be heard, but they are touting plans to address the situation. If “sovereignty” was your word in a drinking game, you’d be pickled within three hours.
In my decades of reporting on tech, I’ve covered multiple efforts by countries to replicate the Silicon Valley effect. While there have been plenty of individual success stories, no country or market has come close to matching the ecosystem and mindset that gave rise to companies such as Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. While investors throw boatloads of cash at American companies, Europeans get relative crumbs. One statistic I heard several times last week was that Anthropic’s recent $65 billion fund-raise was more than the entire sum invested in European and UK AI startups last year. Actual results reported by the EU seem to bear this out.
Nonetheless, sovereignty discussions at Vivatech were infused with hope. Optimists cited significant new funding, collaborative efforts, and next-generation technology that might not be as resource-intensive as the leading large language models. And several cited a wild card that might be the biggest boon to European tech in decades: Donald Trump.
Vivatech overlapped with the G7 conference in Evian-les-Bains, France, where French president Emmanuel Macron lectured AI executives on the sovereignty issue. If the US continued down its path of nationalistic AI, he said, France would take steps to go it on its own. Aiden Gomez, the CEO of Toronto-based Cohere, also tried to convey his sense of urgency to the crowd in Evian. “We need to ensure that a democracy occupies the number two position, and that's not true today,” Gomez told me at Vivatech. “I think the G7 understands that we need a diverse supply chain of AI providers.”
It sounds almost delusional for Europe to think that it can build the world’s second-best AI. More than 20 nations would need to work closely together, overcome their continental impulses to strangle innovation with red tape, and lure unprecedented sums of investment. Most of all, Europe must shift from a risk-averse mindset to a moonshot mentality. But Macron has made some progress. His “Choose France” initiative has won pledges of over 100 billion euros in AI infrastructure, anchored by Softbank's 75 billion-euro commitment to build huge data centers in France—pending approvals, of course.
As for collaborations, Gomez tells me that Cohere is trying to stitch together a multinational chain of partnerships, beginning with one with the German AI firm Aleph Alpha. The idea is to pool resources in both engineering and infrastructure for a “sovereign-first” approach. “A few weeks ago, I was with the king of Spain to sign an MOU with Indra, which is the largest tech company in Spain,” he says.
Yann LeCun, the AI pioneer who recently resigned as Meta’s chief AI scientist, is pursuing Project Tapestry, a massive effort among governments and private industry to join forces in building a state-of-the-art frontier foundation model. “The governments of the world all want AI sovereignty,” he says. “The only way I can see this happening is if there’s an open, free foundation model, on top of which anybody can build their own specialized assistant for their own language, culture, value system, and political biases.”
While all these plans appear reasonable, they seem all too similar to previous failed efforts to elevate European tech. But in 2026, there’s a new element: the Trump administration's clumsy policies that make the status quo utterly intolerable. For generations, the US has lured Europe’s best scientists; they now feel unwelcome. European enrollment in US universities is down. Jakob Uszkoreit, CEO of the AI-based biotech firm Inceptive, says that even by the end of Trump’s first term, he saw talent moving away from the US, a trend that has gained more steam in the current administration.
It wouldn’t take much to significantly drain that talent from US shores, Uszkoreit says. “I’d have no problem assembling an all-star team of Europeans, many of which would leave their very cushy current US frontier lab jobs, provided two things: reasonable personal incentives and they have to be able to do their best work,” he says. (By the way, both Uszkoreit and Gomez are prime examples of what the US might miss if foreign researchers don’t come to America—they are among the eight coauthors of the famous Transformers paper that spurred generative AI. Seven of the eight were foreign-born.)
Earlier this month, the Trump administration gave European tech perhaps its biggest incentive yet to supercharge its own ecosystem. That was when it attempted to limit Anthropic's powerful Claude Fable model by putting it under strict export control regulations, denying foreigners access. Argue all you want over whether this clampdown was justified—from the European point of view it was a wake-up call that sovereignty now equates to survival. A foreign company can’t build a reliable business around Claude or any other American model if at any point the US government can deny access. Even more dire, the designation bans access even by foreign nationals who work at Anthropic, even those who helped develop Fable! Anthropic quickly pulled the model off the market, but the message had been sent: Europeans can’t count on American companies.
European startups are already getting a salutary push from the US government’s actions. “The attention we currently have in Europe would not have been the same without Trump,” says Michael Förtsch, CEO of Qant, a chip startup. The short-lived export controls on Fable, he says, “triggered a complete new discussion on sovereignty in Europe.”
“Europe had gotten pretty complacent in light of a very reliable, well-aligned, near-hegemonic [situation],” says Uszkoreit. “The US just made it clear that in the new world order, that’s over.” Europe has no choice but to pursue AI sovereignty.
This is an edition of Steven Levy’s Backchannel newsletter. Read previous newsletters here.
CommentsBack to topTriangle
You Might Also Like
In your inbox: Brian Kahn’s guide to how the universe works
Leak exposes members of Peter Thiel’s secretive ‘Dialog’ society
Big Story: How Hunter Biden won the internet
Tesla batteries keep getting stolen before they even leave the factory
Special edition: The future of home
Steven Levy covers the gamut of tech subjects for WIRED, in print and online, and has been contributing to the magazine since its inception. His writes Backchannel, a weekly newsletter that puts the biggest tech stories in perspective. He has been writing about technology for more than 30 years, writing ... Read More
Editor at Large
X
TopicsBackchannel - NLEuropepoliticsartificial intelligenceAnthropicDonald Trump
Read More
Here’s Why Anthropic Is Pushing States to Regulate AI Faster
The company endorsed landmark AI transparency laws in California and New York last year, but its head of US state and local policy says they may already be outdated.
Maxwell Zeff
Anthropic Thinks Its Own Success Is Key to Making AI Safe
Anthropic's critics argue it's rapidly accumulating power. The company says that's what responsible AI development looks like.
Maxwell Zeff
This Former DeepMind Exec Thinks the AI Arms Race Could End in Disaster
Verity Harding tells WIRED that the US government’s nationalistic attitude toward AI is evidence that a worst-case scenario is taking shape.
Joel Khalili
Thinking Machines Lab Drops Its First Model
Inkling, a 975-billion-parameter open source model, was trained to understand video and audio. It could help Thinking Machines establish itself among competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI.
Will Knight
OpenAI Staffers Are Funding a Rival Super PAC to Take on Their Boss
OpenAI employees have donated more than $215,000 to a political effort opposing Leading the Future, a group backed by the company’s president, Greg Brockman.
Maxwell Zeff
Anthropic Wants You to Pay Up for Claude Fable 5
Claude subscribers must soon pay usage-based fees to access Anthropic’s best consumer AI model—a sign that the golden era of AI subscriptions is ending.
Maxwell Zeff
Robot Dogs, Teslas, and Rescue Helicopters: The UN AI Summit Was a Lot
Amid live coding sessions and Silicon Valley optimism, the UN’s AI for Good summit wrestled with an urgent question: Can global governance catch up before the technology races beyond its control?
Chris Stokel-Walker
An Inventor of Apple’s FaceID Wants to Analyze Your Brain’s Health With AI
Gidi Littwin’s new AI startup, Hemispheric, makes diagnostic brain scans for conditions like depression, PTSD, and Parkinson’s. He wants the technology to be as cheap and easy as for a blood test.
Isabella Ward
OpenAI’s Chief Futurist Is Leaving the Company
Joshua Achiam spent nearly nine years at OpenAI researching AI safety and made a memorable appearance in the Musk v. Altman trial.
Maxwell Zeff
The $28 Million Mistake That Inspired Estonia’s AI ‘Fuckup Finder’
A single wording mistake cost the government millions. Now Estonia is using AI to spot legal errors before they become law—and to automate more of the state.
Chris Stokel-Walker
You Can Now Sound the Alarm on AI Behaving Badly
Are you worried your AI chatbot is trying to build a bomb or leak personal information about you? There’s a website for that.
Will Knight
AI Isn’t Smarter Than a Baby—Yet
Babies are tremendous learning machines, and key advances for AI may soon be found in the architecture of their little brains.
Will Knight
WIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.
More From WIRED
Subscribe
Newsletters
Livestreams
Travel
FAQ
Contact Us
WIRED Staff
WIRED Education
Editorial Standards
Archive
RSS
Site Map
Accessibility Help
Reviews and Guides
Reviews
Buying Guides
Streaming Guides
Wearables
Coupons
Advertise
Manage Account
Jobs
Press Center
Condé Nast Store
User Agreement
Privacy Policy
Your California Privacy Rights
© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices
Select international siteUnited StatesLargeChevron
Italia
Japón
Czech Republic & Slovakia
Facebook
X
Pinterest
YouTube
Instagram
Tiktok